Submit or Correct an AI Tool, Model, or Provider
How to submit an AI tool, model, inference provider, or benchmark for a free editorial listing, and how to report an outdated price or wrong spec.
Capital & Compute maintains a set of directories covering the AI infrastructure stack: who serves inference, what the models cost per token, which benchmarks mean anything, and which agent extensions are worth installing. Every entry is grounded to a primary source and carries the date it was last checked.
There are two ways to contribute to that: submit something that is missing, or correct something that has gone stale. Both go to contact@capitalandcompute.net. Both are free.
What gets tracked
Each directory records a fixed set of fields. Knowing which ones apply to you is the difference between a submission that can be verified in one pass and one that cannot be used at all.
- Inference providers (35 listed): category, region, what the platform serves, pricing model (per token, per GPU hour, consumption, or mixed), a representative price example, OpenAI API compatibility, free tier terms, and separate home, pricing, and documentation URLs.
- Models: per-token input and output rates, cached input pricing where offered, context length, release and deprecation dates, and the official pricing page each rate is read from.
- Benchmarks (116 listed): what it measures, who built it and in what year, task format and size, the scoring metric, whether it is live or saturated or retired, a representative top score, and the official leaderboard.
- Free model APIs: which host serves it, context length, whether the weights are open, and the terms that actually matter for a free tier: signup requirements, phone verification, rate limits, and whether inputs are used for training.
- Skills, MCP servers, and prompt libraries (138 listed): type, category, maintainer, how it is installed, and the tags that make it findable.
How submissions are evaluated
Every submission is checked against the same questions before anything is written down:
- Is the product actually available to the public, rather than announced or waitlisted?
- Is the pricing verifiable on an official page, not only in a blog post or a press release?
- Is there official documentation a reader can go and check?
- Can every claim be confirmed independently of the vendor making it?
- Is it within scope: the AI infrastructure and cost stack, not adjacent SaaS?
- Are benchmark numbers attributed to whoever ran them, and reported with the harness and subset they came from?
- Is it meaningfully distinct from entries already listed?
An accepted entry enters as representative: grounded to its official URL and stamped with the date it was read. It is promoted to verified only once its numbers are re-checked against that same page. Both states are visible on the page, so a reader always knows which one they are looking at. Prices and specs move weekly in this sector, and pretending otherwise is how a directory quietly becomes wrong.
What to send
Keep it short and link everything. A useful submission gives the official product URL, the official pricing page, the documentation, and a primary source for every number quoted. Marketing copy and press kits are not usable: if a figure cannot be traced to a page the vendor publishes and maintains, it does not get recorded. That rule is the whole reason these directories are worth citing, and it is set out in full in our editorial standards.
Report an outdated price or wrong spec
Corrections are as valuable as new entries, and often more so. If a price has changed, a model has been deprecated, a free tier has been withdrawn, or a specification is simply wrong, send four things: the page it appears on, the field that is wrong, the correct value, and the official source that shows it. Corrections are made promptly and the entry is re-dated, per our corrections policy.
This applies to your own product as much as to anyone else's. If we have you listed at a price you no longer charge, tell us.
Listings are free and editorial
No payment is accepted for a listing, and no listing can be bought. Sponsorship does not create an entry, improve one, change its position, or soften what an entry says. Inclusion, ordering, and wording are editorial decisions and stay that way. If you want to reach this audience commercially, that is a separate and clearly labelled thing: sponsorship and advertising.
A listing is not a guaranteed page
A verified submission earns a row in the relevant directory. Some entries also get a dedicated page of their own, but only where there is genuinely enough to say: how the thing works, how its pricing behaves in practice, where it falls short, and who it suits. A directory row restated as a short page is thin content, and thin content helps nobody. So the entry comes first and the page follows if and when it is earned.
Guest posts and paid links
Neither is accepted, and it is worth being direct about why. Capital & Compute publishes under its brand rather than individual bylines, so there is no byline to offer a contributor. And selling links that pass ranking signals violates Google's spam policies, which is a bad trade for a publication whose only real asset is that its rankings are not for sale.
If you were planning to pitch a guest post, the two things above are the useful alternatives: get your product into a directory on the strength of what it does, or sponsor the site under a clear label. Pitches for link placements, link exchanges, and sponsored do-follow links are declined without reply.
Where to send it
Email contact@capitalandcompute.net. Put "submission" or "correction" in the subject line so it routes correctly. Genuine submissions get a reply within a few business days, and being listed is not conditional on hearing back first: entries are added as they are verified.
Frequently asked questions
- Does Capital & Compute accept guest posts?
- No. The site publishes anonymously under its brand rather than individual bylines, so there is no byline to offer a contributor, and it does not sell links that pass ranking signals. The alternatives are a free editorial listing in one of the directories, or clearly labelled sponsorship.
- How do I get my AI tool listed?
- Email [email protected] with the official product URL, the official pricing page, and the documentation. Every number recorded has to be traceable to a page the vendor publishes and maintains. Submissions are checked for availability, verifiable pricing, independent confirmability, scope, and distinctness from existing entries.
- Is a listing free?
- Yes. No payment is accepted for a listing and no listing can be bought. Sponsorship does not create an entry, improve one, change its position, or alter what it says. Inclusion and ordering are editorial decisions.
- How do I report an outdated price or an incorrect specification?
- Send four things to [email protected]: the page it appears on, the field that is wrong, the correct value, and the official source showing it. The entry is corrected and re-dated. Corrections are welcome for your own product as well as anyone else.
- Will my submission get its own page?
- Not automatically. A verified submission earns a row in the relevant directory. A dedicated page follows only where there is enough to say about how the product works, how its pricing behaves, where it falls short, and who it suits.
- What does representative mean next to an entry?
- It means the entry is grounded to the official page it was read from and stamped with the date it was read, but the figures have not been re-checked since. An entry is promoted to verified once its numbers are confirmed again against that same source. Both states are shown so readers know which they are looking at.